|
Frank Gambale's Message Board
![]() General
![]() MarshallHarrison.com (Page 1)
|
This topic is 4 pages long: 1 2 3 4 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: MarshallHarrison.com |
|
j2 New Member |
Has anyone heard of this guy? He's been a huge inspiration to my playing, just because his stuff is foreign to me. He just got an 8 string and I can't sit still thinking about what he'll come up with - major potential. IP: Logged |
|
shred2er New Member |
I've heard his chops. I am yet to hear some real music from him, though. He does have very good technique, but I am yet to hear him use this technique to play anything other than some pretty impressive chops. For the last few months I've been completely sold on one of my "new discoveries" -- George Bellas. And don't you dare tell me he is an Yngwie clone. He is not! IP: Logged |
|
clovis Member |
George Bellas was the final straw that broke the camel's back for me with shred. I heard him and stopped listening to it all together. I couldn't believe a shredder could exist and have less to say than Yngwie. I hope you didn't buy any lessons from him off his website. THey're a total rip off. He even called me on the phone when I emailed him asking why he was charging so much....I still wouldn't buy any....You want to hear someone who smokes BEllas and Harrison?? Try Shawn Lane.... John IP: Logged |
|
j2 New Member |
Not to start a silly argument, but the only thing Shawn Lane smokes is weed. I had no clue who George Bellas was (is), and I can see why he could turn you off of shred. He sounds just like every other guitarist *trying* to sound classical. The only people he'll amaze are guys like this: "Hey man! What is that, Bawch? Sounds like Motsart man! That's awesome, ahyuck..." Here's my spiel about Harrison... Yea, his chops are insane and impressive, but there's very little music to go along with them - TRUE. However, I think that if he wanted to write music with those kind of chops, we would have heard it already (Dr. Z?) and he himself would've been hard at work writing material. How do you make music from the diminished scale, and how can you say anything is "REAL MUSIC" to begin with (not to get all philosophical, but it is important). The one thing that distinguishes him from the rest - at least from my pov - is that he's not TRYING TO BE SOMEBODY, but occasionally it can sound like Gambale mixed in with Holdsworth. What'd you expect, he said he's been studying Frank's sweeping since day one and half if not all of Holdsworth's stuff is already 'out there.' Don't be so negative about talent, especially in the world we live in where talent is classified as "free-style RAPPING." Be thankful that someone out there isn't a complete moron. IP: Logged |
|
shred2er New Member |
Well, clovis, I have been a Shawn Lane fan since the time my dad was just getting naked to get it on with my mom on the night I was conceived. I don't know what to say, except that for one reason or another I really connect with Bellas' playing. Here are my top few guitar players at the moment: * Shawn Lane I love Bellas' machine-gun style approach, and I am not going to lie about it. I love over-the-top guitar playing. One guy, while reviewing one of Bellas' albums on the Amazon.com site, wrote the following: "When you are that good, nothing that you do is bad, just misunderstood, or not understood at all." I found it striking enough that I still remember it, and I agree with it. I am not saying that you are wrong to dislike his playing, just that I am not wrong either to admire it. And j2, I am not negative about talent. It's just that I have never heard a full-length composition by Harrison. I mean, I have some difficult chops up my own sleeve, but I admit that I am not the best musician I have heard. To make an analogy, having great chops is like having a great vocabulary. However, unless this vocabulary is used to express ideas in a unique manner and style, the person possessing the vocabulary cannot really be called a writer. I feel that Harrison has a great vocabulary, but does not have the necessary stories or essays published to be called a writer. IP: Logged |
|
CleanSweeper Member |
I believe that Marshall Harrison is fantastic at arranging concepts, especially the classical things he has done and the arrangments of some of the Chopin studies. Thaey are great chop builders that don't sound like "excersises", as far as composing abilities I guess that remains to be heard on a full length disc, but I have to say Marshall strikes me as someone who is taking so much in and building a truley amazing approach to his instrument. I take my hat off to a man so dedicated to improving himself as a player, and keep in mind I am sure he is still growing. He could be writing this extrodinary material and just waiting to release it. As far as George Bellas is concerned, I do find him to be an exciting player in that genre, and a very dedicated musician. It may not be jazz fusion but so what, he is making music that means something to him and reaching an audience. His cd roms may not be for everyone but they have inspired people to improve at thier craft, and you cannot deny they guy has chops and those chops work in the context in witch he is playing. He has appeared on many different albums and is relentless in his playing.....you have to admit the man plays with conviction, and that counts for alot...Peace IP: Logged |
|
JonBjork New Member |
quote: Well put CleanSweeper IP: Logged |
|
Koeppe Member |
Bellas is for sure good for what he does. Some responses to this tread just proved my opinion that many jazz/fusion fans/players tend to put down neoclassical/shred players, although they still have years to go to achieve their level of playing. I like jazz/fusion and neoclassical/shred equally, and it's this arrogance towards other genres I've only disocvered among jazz/fusion fanatics. I guess some shredder would never put down a jazz player only because he's not into that style of music. But the other way around, that often happens (especially on this board). On stage, Bellas would for sure blow off anybody on this site (with the exception of Frank Gambale and Derryl Gabel). On the other hand, I think that a GREAT fusion player (like Holdsworth, Howe, Garsed, Metheny, Gambale, Henderson etc.) would never put down a shredder just because he's into a different genre. That whole "Yngwie sucks" and "I'm better than you, because I can solo over changes and you can only do high speed arpeggios" thing starts to get on my nerves. Derryl Gabel once said something very true: you're only good at what you practice. So guys like Bellas spend more time on practicing arpeggios and scales, while guys like Henderson spend more time on improvising. Both are masters in their own style, but could you really say one is better than another, just because he has practiced something different? IP: Logged |
|
CleanSweeper Member |
Definatly!! It is about what motivates your spirit to achieve!! A great player is a great player weather he or she is blowing over insane changes or sequencing 3 octave sweep arpeggios at light speed, as long as they are playing what is true to them!! IP: Logged |
|
CleanSweeper Member |
Hey JonBjork.....I have heard your stuff and I am very impressed!! Keep me posted on upcoming stuff!! IP: Logged |
|
jazbrokr Member |
quote: I think not...... Btw, I respect shredders totally. Not my cup of tea, but I am friends with many and am blown away by their technical prowess. Scott IP: Logged |
|
hymen162 Member |
quote: Wow, a lot of TRUE points here in this one! IP: Logged |
|
Pablo Member |
Personnaly i'm not at all blown away by these so-called shredders. I think that a guy like mike landau smokes all of them regarding the tone, the phrasing, the note choice, etc... Speed is only a matter of practise, anyone with some spare time can achieve it, but improvising is much more difficult. I still can't figure out about the mechanics that goes in FG's head when he soloes over complex chord changes. I'd be curious to hear bellas playing a slow blues without his stupid yngwie chops. IP: Logged |
|
JonBjork New Member |
quote: Whoah...thanks alot dude IP: Logged |
|
hymen162 Member |
quote: Nahhh...I disagree with this comment. A shredder, to me, is a guy who REALLY plays the f-uck outta his axe. Hendrix shreds, Holdsworth shreds, Vai shreds, Yngwie shreds, Gambale shreds, Lucia shreds, Lane shreds, SRV shreds etc... [This message has been edited by hymen162 (edited 08-27-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
Pablo Member |
ok i realize i was rude with george , but though what a silly haircut
IP: Logged |
|
Pablo Member |
quote:
IP: Logged |
|
hymen162 Member |
quote: I've never heard of George Bellas to tell you the truth (I'm not too interested either since I have stopped searching for "shredders" along time ago). Also, YES, I agree, our little friend George looks like he is "somewhat" obsessed with that ridiculous 80's look BUT Yngwie looks like a bigger fruit to me, with the tight spandex leather pants, 9 story high hairspray teased hair, "terminator" shades, bright white cowboy boots with spurs and that leopard skin woman's coat. It's 2002 for christsake GUYS!!! IP: Logged |
|
hymen162 Member |
quote: Who's Peter North? IP: Logged |
|
Pablo Member |
quote: he's the FG of porn IP: Logged |
|
Koeppe Member |
quote: Well man, you're exactly that kind of guy I was refering to in my post. IP: Logged |
|
Pablo Member |
quote: Dude, i was only stating my opinion not a fact. And i apologized for being rude with bellas. Sorry but you know nothing about the kind of guy i am, if you can't take other's opinions then i can't help ya. When i was a kid, i was into shred, the whole mike varney stuff, so i know what i'm talking about. This debate seems to be recurrent on guitarists boards. Now concerning marshall, i think he's a technical monster, i saw the videos. I'm still waiting for something interesting from him. IP: Logged |
|
shred2er New Member |
quote:Okay, I hate to add fuel to the fire, but the above remark is blatantly false. (If what follows sounds rather childish, please excuse me.) Speed and dexterity are physiological issues, and as such it is safe to say that not everyone is born with the same level of coordination and quick reflexes. Therefore it is unreasonable to say that anyone can become fast simply through practice. There is a certain level that is attainable by everyone -- say, the B- level -- but in order to reach the B+ and higher levels, one must be born with the coordination and reflexes. The situation is similar with athletes. I am sure that EVERY NBA player practises very hard. Yet, Kobe Bryant and Allen Iverson are superstars. This has to do with inborn ability, not practice schedules; the latter only hones the former. Okay, I'm off the soapbox now. IP: Logged |
|
Magnus Member |
Getting back to the original subject; I'd say that Harrison has got potential. But I've watched all his videos; and I think he's most of a static player. It seems to me that a lot of his improvsations/ideas are based on technique rather than melody; and that he is building tension up to the fast parts. I'm not saying that this is by any means wrong; but it's the reason why he is not a favourite of mine. If he does an album, I'd be glad to check that out. IP: Logged |
|
hymen162 Member |
quote:Okay, I hate to add fuel to the fire, but the above remark is blatantly false. (If what follows sounds rather childish, please excuse me.) Speed and dexterity are physiological issues, and as such it is safe to say that not everyone is born with the same level of coordination and quick reflexes. Therefore it is unreasonable to say that anyone can become fast simply through practice. There is a certain level that is attainable by everyone -- say, the B- level -- but in order to reach the B+ and higher levels, one must be born with the coordination and reflexes. The situation is similar with athletes. I am sure that EVERY NBA player practises very hard. Yet, Kobe Bryant and Allen Iverson are superstars. This has to do with inborn ability, not practice schedules; the latter only hones the former. Okay, I'm off the soapbox now.[/QUOTE] I totally disagree with this statement, professional sports and playing the guitar are completely different. I firmly believe that with enough discipline and practice anyone can play really "technical" stuff on the guitar. It may take awhile but it's not that difficult to do. Discipline is the BIG FACTOR here. Now, I'm not going even to get into the other 'factors' that truly separate technique heavy mindless hacks from the WELL PLAYED, THOUGHT-OUT, IMAGINATIVE, and EXPRESSIVE technical monsters, that's another story all together, *BUT* to SIMPLY make your fingers do tonnes of "gymnastics" on the fretboard is not that hard to do. Later. IP: Logged |
|
Pablo Member |
yep hymen, i strongly beleive in the superiority of mind over matter. IP: Logged |
|
jazbrokr Member |
Not everyone can learn to shred. I agree that a certain amount of dexterity is required. Some people will never be able to do it. I also think it is far rarer to have a musician who can hear complex melodies in their head and be able to translate them onto the guitar than a guy who can sweep or alt pick fast. There are hundreds of guys who all sound like that. I am not going to say that jazz is superior to shred or vice versa. They are different and each is GREAT. I do think that many of the fusion guys would have an easier time shredding because the harmonic content is much more basic (please don't flame). Regarding the snob comment about jazzers, if you read the above posts you will see the opposite. It was said that no one except FG and Derryl could hang on stage with Bellas. In fact, the quote was that we would get "blown" away. I found this totally ridiculous and a snob attack against fusion and jazz players. I am not being arrogant, but I will get on stage with ANY shredder, any time, and not be "blown" away. I suspect that over a blues, funk, fusion, swing, bop, or reggae tune that most good fusion players will sound more at home. This is not an attack against shred, just pointing out that there is a big world of guitar out there and shear speed is only one small part. In the end, learn as many styles as possible! IP: Logged |
|
hymen162 Member |
quote: You honestly believe that? Seriously. IP: Logged |
|
jazbrokr Member |
quote: Yes, I believe it. I know people that no matter how hard they practice, they have sloppy technique. Not everyone has the neccessary coordination! IP: Logged |
|
JonBjork New Member |
quote: In my experience as a teacher is seems that the problem with most people when it comes to technique, is the fact that they don´t HEAR when it´s not clean and synchronised. If you don´t hear it yourself it´s almost impossible to fix the problem even if you are assisted by a teacher. Same thing with people with poor timing, they simply don´t feel when their timing is off. Best regards IP: Logged |
|
hymen162 Member |
quote: They may not have it now BUT in another 5 years they might. Especially, if they are inspired by virtuosity. I mean if your OPEN to criticism from other players who say your sloppy then if your smart you'd refine that and work on it. This happened to me a few years back. I got together with a guy who could really play. We were jamming in his basement and he was saying shit like "man, that's f-ucking sloppy, slow down and mute the other strings with your palm more". He was making these ugly faces too when I was sounding like shit! Anyway, I inquired and he gave me some pointers on how to clean it up, years later it's all good now and I can rip cleanly BUT I was open to criticism and my passion for the instrument drove me to refine my technique to another level. Plus, I was always recording myself and busting my brothers balls with questions like "Does each note sound clear when I play fast like that etc." and he would be brutally honest and say “yes” or “no”. I mean come on Scott there must have been a point in your playing where you’ve experienced the same sorts of technical dilemmas too but due to your apparent love and dedication to the guitar you have overcome those obstacles. I think it just comes down to the individual’s discipline. Most people will quit in the early stages, not because they are physically limited BUT because they lose focus and discipline. Also, not everyone who buys a guitar wants to burn or go crazy, some people have different agendas but you’ve already alluded to that in one of your previous statements. IP: Logged |
|
CleanSweeper Member |
I feel that you really have to love the music you are pursuing. If someone has all the chops in the world but does not have the passion for neo-classical shred it will show in thier playing. If someone has aquired a certain amount of theory and understanding of improvisation but jazz doesn't spark inspiration in them they will not come across as a great jazz musician....If you love music and all the styles that exist again that will show because what I gather is that what really comes through in a great musician is passion for thier art!! IP: Logged |
|
Koeppe Member |
quote:
IP: Logged |
|
hymen162 Member |
quote: I have experienced this too. It is SO true! IP: Logged |
|
jazbrokr Member |
quote: We're cool. BTW, I never put down shredders when they shred. I have put down shredders who try to play jazz (like Macalpine) because it is lame sounding in my opinion. This is not a snob thing, it is just my opinion that that particular guy sounds bad playing fusion. He sounds great on neoclassical, but his timing is all wrong on the jazzy stuff. I will say that many shredders I know, and I know a lot, are not very good on anything but shred. The guys that diversify and learn other styles become less known as shred guys. For example, Greg Howe. He is not a shredder, imo. I agree that many fusion or jazz guys would totally suck at shred so therefore no one has the right to put it down. Scott IP: Logged |
|
flat9 Member |
I love hearing guitar players shred as much as the next guy - Steve Vai, Satch etc, but they do it with a musical focus in mind. I also love listeneing to Jazz / Fusion, or anything as a matter of fact. I took the time to visit the George Bellas site recently, and I gotta say, I found NOTHING musical about any of it whatsoever. Just an opinion of course. b9 IP: Logged |
|
flat9 Member |
quote: Ppl who don't progress no matter how hard they practice don't achieve it simply because they have false goals (subconciously don't WANT to do it) OR they don't believe they can do it, and link an air of mystery to the guitar or whatever. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with inborn ability. Ppl who don't progress are just playing for the wrong reasons. Trust me. If there's anyone on this board who would like to progress, all u need to know is - IT IS TOTALLY POSSIBLE to achieve anything u want with your playing. You just have to WANT to. Belief and Desire are everything u need. ( and hands of course b9 IP: Logged |
|
hymen162 Member |
What's the definition of Shred? Who was the first shredder? Are we only talking about that particular "label" that was branded on players who sounded a certain way in the 80’s? You know, that sound and style of playing that stemmed from Eddie Van Halen. Stuff like, dive-bomb runs, neo-classical arpeggios, harmonic screams, whammy tricks, scalar tapping, super charged tone, velocity etc. To me, shred was always a stupid "label", I myself, deduced it to, anyone who can REALLY play his or her guitar. Like I've mentioned earlier, Hendrix shredded, Holdsworth shreds, Lucia, SRV etc. I mean "grunge" or "alternative-rock" are other examples of really stupid labels too. The media comes up with these DUMB LABELS and they don't really have much meaning. I’ve always perceived grunge and alternative rock as ROCK MUSIC. For example, Nirvana is rock music it’s not “grunge” or an “alternative”etc. A lot of “grunge” stems from older bands like Black Sabbath, Iggy & The Stooges and the Sex Pistols. The people who come up with these stupid labels probably think Rock ‘N Roll is that late 50’s early 60’s Chuck Berry stuff and that Elvis Presley is the “King” of the genre. Please, how stupid? Sometimes, when I really think about all of the titles we use to categorize and label music, I just start laughing. IP: Logged |
|
jazbrokr Member |
quote: That is so not true. Peoples brains are hardwired from a very early age. Some people are not going to possess the hardwired coordination to play well. You are kidding yourself is you believe that anyone can succeed at anything. If this were true, you could learn to play piano like Chick Corea. If you don't have independence between hands, do not worry! You can teach yourself. Just stretching the point. IP: Logged |
|
flat9 Member |
quote: Well..if that were the case, disabled ppl would just give up (on life). Disabled ppl are some of the world's greatest achievers aren't they. Should I / we give up trying to learn Jazz / Fusion then? If ppl can learn to smoke ( I don't BTW, I think it's disgusting), then it's actual proof that u can tell your brain to do exactly what u want it to...and it'll do it. The brain just requires the right QUESTIONS. b9 [This message has been edited by flat9 (edited 08-28-2002).] IP: Logged |
This topic is 4 pages long: 1 2 3 4 All times are PT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d